Intro to the Cutting-Edge of Privacy Tech: MPC, ZK-SNARKs, and ZK-STARKs

Intro to the Cutting-Edge of Privacy Tech: MPC, ZK-SNARKs, and ZK-STARKs

As we delve deeper into the digital age, the call for privacy and security becomes increasingly louder. At the forefront of this movement, a trio of leading-edge technologies is making waves: Multi-Party Computation (MPC), Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge (ZK-SNARKs), and Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-STARKs). Today, we’re breaking down these complex terms and shedding light on how they're revolutionizing the blockchain landscape.

The Intricacies of Multi-Party Computation (MPC)

In the realm of privacy tech, MPC is an essential player. This technology hinges on the concept of secret sharing, which distributes data among parties in a way that prevents any single party from accessing the original data. Employing protocols such as Yao's Garbled Circuits, Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson (GMW), and SPDZ MPC allows for secure computation, which has plenty of applications in health data processing, genetics, census data and more.

In the blockchain context, MPC has found utility in the creation of secure multi-signature wallets, threshold signature schemes and distributed key generation-- like we use in the governance of our Tangle Network, and privacy-preserving smart contracts. It’s a powerful tool that’s paving the way for enhanced security measures within decentralized systems.

An Overview of ZK-SNARKs

ZK-SNARKs, a type of Zero-Knowledge Proof, are gaining traction for their unique properties: completeness, soundness, and succinctness. In essence, these proofs allow one party to prove to another that they know a value, without revealing any information apart from the fact that they know the value.

However, ZK-SNARKs come with a catch: they require a trusted setup. This necessity has sparked some concerns, as it poses a potential vulnerability in the system if the setup process is compromised.

Blockchain projects such as our own Hubble Bridge, Zcash, Aztec, and StarkWare have successfully harnessed ZK-SNARKs to deliver confidential transactions and private asset transfers,

The Emergence of ZK-STARKs

As an evolution of ZK-SNARKs, ZK-STARKs address the need for a trusted setup while offering quantum-resistance for long-term security. This technology has the potential to withstand the advent of quantum computing, a feature that's particularly crucial in today's rapidly progressing tech ecosystem.

That said, ZK-STARKs are not without their own set of challenges. They demand larger proof sizes and higher computational resources compared to their ZK-SNARK counterparts.

For Layer 2 scaling solutions, ZK-Rollups are harnessing the power of ZK-STARKs (and ZK-SNARKs) to bundle transactions off-chain. This approach maintains the security and privacy of the main blockchain while enhancing transaction throughput and alleviating network congestion.

Understanding the Trade-offs

The choice between MPC, ZK-SNARKs, and ZK-STARKs isn't straightforward. Each technology brings its own trade-offs, involving factors like trust assumptions, computational complexity, proof size, and quantum resistance. It's a balancing act, and the ideal choice may vary depending on the specific use case and requirements.

Gazing into the Future

As the blockchain ecosystem continues to evolve, we can anticipate the emergence of even more advanced privacy solutions. These technologies will keep pushing the boundaries, enhancing the capabilities of decentralized networks, and setting new standards for privacy and security. Our hope in making all of our work open-source, is that community ownership drives innovation and the introduction of ever-better tools into the systems we helped kindle.

Interested in learning more about privacy tech? Join our newsletter and follow us on Twitter for regular updates.